A Hasselblad Flextight X5, which price lies in the range of 20.000 €, scans films with a brilliance and sharpness, which no other film scanner achieves.The Canon FS4000US is in terms of scan speed like a snake compared to to Nikon Coolscan V anyway it can process 4 mounted slides in the batch mode, whilst you have to reload the Nikon after each single slide.Digitizing a 35mm film roll with 36 pictures can be done by the Reflecta RPS as a matter of course, whilst you have to cut the film roll into film strips when working with the Nikon. The extremely expensive Nikon Super Coolscan 5000 ED is superior to a Reflecta RPS in almost all disciplines. Anyway, the big Nikon fails at the simple task to scan an APS film roll, whilst the old Minolta can do it as a matter of course. It is clear, that a used Minolta DiMAGE Scan Dual IV cannot keep up with the 10 times more expensive Nikon Super Coolscan 9000 ED.With the following examples I want to demonstrate the difficulties of a direct comparison of the scanners available. The differences between the singular scanners are too big. Since we have begun to publish scanner reviews on this website we have always emphasized that it is hard to compare the few film scanners available on the market. Film scanner ranking and scanner comparison
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |